World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

East Slavic languages

Article Id: WHEBN0000010070
Reproduction Date:

Title: East Slavic languages  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Haplogroup T-M184, Russian language, Belarusian language, Ukrainian language, Slavic languages
Collection: East Slavic Languages
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

East Slavic languages

East Slavic
Geographic
distribution:
Eastern Europe
Linguistic classification: Indo-European
Proto-language: Old East Slavic
Subdivisions:
ISO 639-5: zle
Glottolog: east1426[1]
}
  Countries where an East Slavic language is the national language

The East Slavic languages constitute one of three regional subgroups of Slavic languages, currently spoken in Eastern Europe. It is the group with the largest numbers of speakers, far out-numbering the Western and Southern Slavic groups. The existing East Slavic languages are Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian;[2] Rusyn is considered to be either a separate language or a dialect of Ukrainian.[3]

The East Slavic languages descend from a common predecessor, the language of the medieval Kievan Rus' (9th to 13th centuries).

All these languages use the Cyrillic script, but with particular modifications.

Contents

  • Classification 1
  • Differentiation 2
    • Features 2.1
    • Notes 2.2
  • History 3
    • Influence of Church Slavonic 3.1
  • Current status 4
  • References 5
  • Further reading 6

Classification

Differentiation

The East Slavic territory shows a definite linguistic continuum with many transitional dialects. Between Belarusian and Ukrainian there is the Polesian dialect, which shares features from the both languages. East Polesian is a transitional variety between Belarusian and Ukrainian on the one hand, and between South Russian and Ukrainian on the other hand. While Belarusian and Southern Russian form a continuous area, making it virtually impossible to draw a line between two languages. Central or Middle Russian (with its Moscow sub-dialect), the transitional step between the North and the South, became a base for the Russian literary standard. Northern Russian with its predecessor, the Old Novgorod dialect, has many original and archaic features. As well, existing several centuries within Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Belarusian and Ukrainian share many common elements, lexical and grammatical above all. Ruthenian, the mixed Belarusian-Ukrainian literary language with Church Slavonic substratum and Polish adstratum, was together with Middle Polish an official language in Belarus and Ukraine until the end of the 18th century.

Features

Isoglosses Northern
Russian
Standard Russian
(Moscow dialect)
Southern
Russian
Belarusian Ukrainian
reduction
of unstressed /o/ (akanye)
no yes[n 1] no[n 2]
pretonic /ʲe/ (yakanye) /ʲe/ /ʲɪ/ /ʲæ/ /e/[n 3]
Proto-Slavic *i /i/ /ɪ/[n 4]
Proto-Slavic *y /ɨ/
stressed CoC /o/ /i/[n 5][n 6]
Proto-Slavic *ě /e̝~i̯ɛ~i/ /e/
Proto-Slavic *c /t͡s/[n 7] /t͡ɕ/
Proto-Slavic *č /t͡ʃʲ/[n 8] /tʂ/
Proto-Slavic *skj, zgj /ʃʲː/,[n 9] /ʒʲː/ /ʂtʂ/, /ʐdʐ/
soft dental stops /tʲ/, /dʲ/[n 10] /t͡ɕ/, /d͡ʑ/ /tʲ/, /dʲ/
Proto-Slavic *v /v/ /w~u̯/
/f/ (including devoiced /v/) /f/[n 11] /x~xv~xw~xu̯/
Prothetic /v~w~u̯/ no[n 12] yes
Proto-Slavic *g /g/ /ɣ/ /ɦ/
Hardening of final soft labials no yes
Hardening of soft /rʲ/ no yes partially
Proto-Slavic *CrьC, ClьC,
CrъC, CrъC
/rʲe/, /lʲe/,
/ro/, /lo/
/rɨ/, /lʲi/,
/rɨ/, /lɨ/
/rɪ/, /lɪ/,
/rɪ/, /lɪ/
Proto-Slavic *-ъj-, -ьj- /oj/, /ej/ /ɨj/, /ij/ /ɪj/
Proto-Slavic adj. end. *-ьjь /ej/ /ij/,[n 13] /ej/ /ej/[n 14] /ij/ /ɪj/, /ij/
Proto-Slavic adj. end. *-ъjь /oj/ /ɨj/,[n 13] /oj/ /oj/[n 15] /ɨj/ /ɪj/
Loss of the vocative case no yes[n 16] no
3 sg. & pl. Pres. Ind. /t/ /tʲ/ *tʲ > /t͡ɕ/ /tʲ/
Dropping out
of 3 sg. Pres. Ind.
no yes
3 sg. masc. Past. Ind. /v~w~u̯/[n 17] /l/ /v~w~u̯/
2nd palatalization in oblique cases no yes

Notes

  1. ^ Except for the Polesian dialect of Brest
  2. ^ Except for the Eastern Polesian dialect
  3. ^ Consonants are hard before /e/
  4. ^ Except for some dialects
  5. ^ In some Ukrainian dialects C/o/C can be /y~y̯e~y̯i~u̯o/
  6. ^ In some Ukrainian dialects PSl *ě can be /e̝~i̯ɛ/
  7. ^ Can be /s/ in South Russian
  8. ^ Can be /ʃʲ/ in Southern Russian
  9. ^ Can be /ʃʲt͡ʃʲ/, /ʂː/
  10. ^ In Russian light affrication can occur: [tˢʲ] , [dᶻʲ]
  11. ^ In some Northern Russian sub-dialects /v/ is not devoiced to /f/
  12. ^ Except for восемь "eight" and some others
  13. ^ a b Only unstressed, Church Slavonic influence
  14. ^ Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [ʲəj]
  15. ^ Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [əj]
  16. ^ New vocative from a pure stem: мам, пап, Машь, Вань etc.
  17. ^ In the dialect of Vologda

History

East Slavic languages in the 14th century

When the common Old East Slavic language became separated from the ancient Slavic tongue common to all Slavs is difficult to ascertain, though in the 12th century the common language of Rus' is still referred to in contemporary as Slavic.

Therefore, a crucial differentiation has to be made between the history of the East Slavic dialects and that of the literary languages employed by the Eastern Slavs. Although most ancient texts betray the dialect their author(s) and/or scribe(s) spoke, it is also clearly visible that they tried to write in a language different from their dialects and to avoid those mistakes that enable us nowadays to locate them.

In both cases one has to keep in mind that the history of the East Slavic languages is of course a history of written texts. We do not know how the writers of the preserved texts would have spoken in every-day life.

Influence of Church Slavonic

After the conversion of the East Slavic region to Christianity the people used service books borrowed from Bulgaria, which were written in Old Church Slavonic.[4] The Church Slavonic language was strictly used only in text, while the colloquial language of the Bulgarians was communicated in its spoken form.

Throughout the Middle Ages (and in some way up to the present day) there existed a duality between the Church Slavonic language used as some kind of 'higher' register (not only) in religious texts and the popular tongue used as a 'lower' register for secular texts. It has been suggested to describe this situation as diglossia, although there do exist mixed texts where it is sometimes very hard to determine why a given author used a popular or a Church Slavonic form in a given context. Church Slavonic was a major factor in the evolution of modern Russian, where there still exists a "high stratum" of words that were imported from this language.[5]

Current status

All of these languages are today separate in their own right. In the Russian Empire the official view was that the Belarusian ("White Russian"), Ukrainian ("Little Russian"), and Russian ("Great Russian") languages were dialects of one common "Russian" language (the common languages of Eastern Slavic countries). In the course of the 20th century, "Great Russian" came to be known as Russian proper, "Little Russian" as Ukrainian and "White Russian" as Belarusian.

References

  1. ^ Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "East Slavic". Glottolog 2.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 
  2. ^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 79–89.
  3. ^ The language of Carpathian Rus': Genetic AspectsDulichenko, Aleksandr
  4. ^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 63–65.
  5. ^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 477–478.

Further reading

  • Comrie, Bernard; Corbett, Greville G, eds. (1993). "East Slavonic languages". The Slavonic languages. London, New York: Routledge. pp. 827–1036.  
  •  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.